Advertiser Disclosure

Featured

MagnifyMoney: 2016 Housing Affordability Study

Editorial Note: The editorial content on this page is not provided or commissioned by any financial institution. Any opinions, analyses, reviews, statements or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author’s alone, and may not have been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities prior to publication.

Housing Affordability Study

As the cost of housing soars ever higher and household earnings remain stubbornly stagnant, how realistic is homeownership for young people today?

Saving up for a new home can feel like an endless slog for young working Americans. The upfront costs alone — the down payment, closing costs, property taxes, etc. — are enough to scare off prospective buyers who are struggling to make ends meet.

Just over one-third of Americans under age 35 owned homes as of mid-2016, down 12% from 2010, according to U.S. Census data. While homeownership rates fell across all age groups during that same period, none experienced a steeper drop-off than the under-35s.

MagnifyMoney wanted to figure out how realistic homeownership is for young Americans today — that is, how long it would take them to save up for a new home in their area if they started saving now.

Calculating Home Affordability

Our analysis revealed two different sets of buyers — those who can afford the cost of a new home in their area and those who cannot. Affordability was largely driven by a worker’s ability to qualify for a mortgage loan large enough to cover the cost of a median-priced home in their metro area. Given these two different cases, we used two methods to determine how long it would take these groups to save for a home.

For buyers who can’t afford a large enough mortgage:

We assumed that the borrower can spare 35% of their monthly income toward mortgage-related payments. Based on this amount and the current interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, we calculated the total mortgage that the borrower can afford to take.

We then took the mortgage amount they would qualify for and subtracted it from the cost of a median-priced home in their area to find the mortgage gap they need to fill. Then, we added other necessary upfront costs: 4.5% closing costs and a standard emergency cash reserve equal to one month’s mortgage payment.

We determined, based on the median income for their age, how long it would take to save that amount, assuming a 20% savings rate.

Example:

We estimate a 25 to 44 year-old homebuyer in Salinas, Calif., would reasonably qualify for a $275,385 mortgage. A median-priced home in Salinas, Calif., costs $750,000. So, she would have to save at least $474,615 to fill the mortgage gap. On top of that, she would pay another $33,750 in closing costs (assuming an estimate of 4.5%) and need to set aside a $1,274 emergency cash reserve.

In total, she would need to come up with $509,612 to be able to buy a home in her area. If she saved 20% of her income toward that goal, it would take her 46.75 years.

For buyers who can afford a large enough mortgage:

Once again, we assumed that the borrower can spare 35% of their monthly income toward mortgage-related payments. Based on this amount and the current interest rates for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, we calculated the total mortgage the borrower can afford to take.

We then determined how much they’d need to save for a 20% down payment. We added to that the cost of closing costs and a one-month mortgage reserve.

For example:

A median-priced home in Johnstown, Penn., costs $74,900. So this buyer would have to save at least $14,980 to cover a 20% down payment. On top of that, he would pay another $3,370 in closing costs (assuming an estimate of 4.5%) and set aside $1,370 in an emergency cash reserve.

In total, he’d need to save $19,720. Saving 20% of his income toward this goal, it would take him 1.85 years.

Key Findings

  • Get ready for the long haul: Of the 380 metro areas we analyzed, we found no place in America where a worker of any age group could realistically save up for a new home in less than a year.Across all 380 metro areas analyzed…
    • 45 to 65 year-olds would need an average of 4.69 years to save for a home.
    • 25 to 44 year-olds would need an average of 5.63 years to save for a home.
    • 15 to 24 year-olds would an average of 27.2 years to save for a home.
  • Where homeownership is completely out of reach:
    • In 20.79% of metros (79 out of 380), workers of all age groups wouldn’t be able to qualify for a mortgage loan large enough to cover the cost of a median-priced home.
    • 15 to 24 year-olds wouldn’t qualify for a mortgage loan large enough to cover the cost of a median priced home in 357 out of 380 metros analyzed (93.95%).
    • 25 to 44 year-olds wouldn’t qualify for a mortgage loan large enough to cover the cost of a median-priced home in 68 out of 380 metros analyzed (17.89%).
    • 45 to 65 year-olds wouldn’t qualify for a mortgage loan large enough to cover the cost of a median-priced home in 29 out of 380 metros analyzed (7.63%).

The least and most affordable metros for 25 to 44-year-olds

25-44-The-Most-Easiest-Places
25-44-The-Most-Difficult-Places

A closer look at the housing market for 25 to 44-year-olds:

  • The most affordable metro area: Johnstown, Penn., is the easiest place for 25 to 44 year-olds to save for a home. The key: Affordable housing is in abundance. A median-priced home in Johnstown is $74,900. With a goal of saving enough to cover a 20% down payment, closing costs, and a one-month mortgage payment reserve, the total amount workers would need to save is $19,720. Earning the median annual income for that area of $53,164, they would need just 1.85 years to save.
  • The least affordable metro area: Salinas, Calif., is the most difficult metro area for 25 to 44 year-olds dreaming of homeownership. Earning the median annual salary of $54,499 and looking at a median-priced home listed at $750,000, they would need a staggering 46.75 years to save up enough. The reason? On an annual household income of $54,499, a homebuyer would only realistically be able to qualify for a $271,000 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loan, leaving a half-million-dollar gap to fill.
  • Midwest is best: 9 out of the 10 most affordable metro areas are located in the Midwest, where housing prices are significantly lower compared to other regions. On average, it would take just 2.28 years for a 25 to 44 year-old to save for a home in the 10 most affordable metros.
  • California is where homeownership dreams go to die: 9 out of the top 10 most expensive metro areas for 25 to 44 year-old homebuyers are in California.
    • The average time needed to save for a home in the top 10 most expensive metro areas is a whopping 29.15 years.
    • It would take 25 to 44 year-olds at least three years to save for a home in 7.37% of metro areas.
    • It would take 25 to 44 year-olds between three and five years to save for a home in 53.16% of metro areas.
    • It would take 25 to 44 year-olds between five and 10 years to save for a home in 34.47% of metro areas.
    • It would take 25 to 44 year-olds more than 10 years to save for a home in 5.00% of metro areas.

The least and most affordable metros for 45 to 65-year-olds

45-65-The-Most-Easiest-Places
45-65-The-Most-Difficult-Places

A closer look at the housing market for 45 to 65-year-olds:

  • The most affordable metro area: Danville, Ill., is the easiest place for 45 to 65 year-olds to save for a home today. A median-priced home in Danville is $68,200. With goal of saving enough to cover a 20% down payment, closing costs, and a one-month mortgage payment reserve, the total amount workers would need to save is $18,012. Earning the median annual income for their age group in that area ($51,975), they would need just 1.73 years to save.
  • The least affordable metro area: Homeownership dreams don’t get any more realistic with age in Salinas, Calif. It is also the most difficult metro area for 45 to 65 year-olds dreaming of homeownership. Even though this age group earns a median income 22% higher than 25 to 44 year-olds in this area, it would still take them nearly three decades (28.98 years) to save up for a median-priced home of $750,000. On an annual household income of $70,368, a 45 to 65 year-old homebuyer would only realistically be able to qualify for a $377,567 30-year fixed-rate loan, leaving a massive gap to fill — even without including closing costs and a one-month mortgage reserve.
    • It would take 45 to 65 year-olds at least three years to save for a home in 16.32% of metro areas.
    • It would take 45 to 65 year-olds between three and five years to save for a home in 57.37% of metro areas.
    • It would take 45 to 65 year-olds between five and 10 years to save for a home in 23.16% of metro areas.
    • It would take 45 to 65 year-olds more than 10 years to save for a home in 3.16% of metro areas.
  • Midwest is best: 9 out of the 10 most affordable metro areas for 45 to 65 year-olds are also located in the Midwest, where housing prices are significantly lower compared to other regions.
    • On average, it would take just under three years (2.08) to save for a home in the 10 most affordable metros.
  • The California struggle: 9 out of the top 10 most expensive metro areas for 45 to 65 year-old homebuyers also are in California.
    • The average time needed to save for a home in the top 10 most expensive metro areas for this age group is a whopping 19.72 years.

The least and most affordable metros for 15 to 24-year-olds

15-24-The-Easiest-Places
15-24-The-Most-Difficult-Places

A closer look at the housing market for 15 to 24-year olds:

Of course, we don’t know many 15-year-olds who are shopping around for a single-family home these days, but U.S. Census Bureau data limited us to this age range. However, our findings still shine a light into the challenges facing the youngest homebuyers.

  • It would take 15 to 24 year-olds at least three years to save for a home in 0% of metro areas.
  • It would take 15 to 24 year-olds between three and five years to save for a home in 1.58% of metro areas.
  • It would take 15 to 24 year-olds between five and 10 years to save for a home in 23.42% of metro areas.
  • It would take 15 to 24 year-olds more than 10 years to save for a home in 75.00% of metro areas.
  • The most affordable metro area: Sheboygan, Wisc., is the easiest place for 15 to 24 year-olds to save for a home today. Although median-priced homes are relatively more expensive in Sheboygan ($134,900) than other inexpensive metro areas on this list, young workers there earn relatively higher salaries, which enables them to save more toward future home costs. With a goal of saving enough to cover a 20% down payment, closing costs, and a one-month mortgage payment reserve, the total amount workers would need to save is $33,877. Earning the median annual income for their age group in that area ($38,510), they would need just 4.40 years to save.
  • The least affordable metro area: Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Calif., isn’t simply a difficult place for young workers to save for a home — it’s pretty much impossible. On an annual household income of $21,178, a 15 to 24 year-old homebuyer would only realistically be able to qualify for a $36,506 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loan. With a median-priced home listed at $769,500, their mortgage loan would hardly make a dent. They would need 181.27 years to save enough to fill in that gap.
    • In the 10 most expensive metros, it would take 15 to 24 year-olds an average of 129.53 years to save for a home.
  • Things look much better in the South and Midwest: The 10 most affordable metro areas for 15 to 24 year-olds are also located in the Midwest and the South, where housing prices are significantly lower compared to other regions.
    • On average, it would take just under five years (4.79) to save for a home in the 10 most affordable metros.
  • Surprisingly expensive metros for 15 to 24 year-olds:
    • While 6 out of the 10 most expensive metro areas are located in California, there were some surprising findings in other states.
      • The 4th most expensive metro is Corvallis, Ore. Home prices are half as high as the most expensive metros on this list, but median incomes for this age group are among the lowest: $12,369.
      • Morgantown, W.Va., is the 6th most unaffordable metro for the youngest workers. 15 to 24 year-old workers in Morgantown earn among the lowest median incomes in the 380 metros we analyzed: $8,805.

Housing Affordability Calculator

Find out how long it would take you to save up for a home in your area.

Calculator Embed Code:
<iframe id=”home_afford”src=”//magnifymoney.com/calculator/home-affordability-calculator”width=”100%”height=”362″frameborder=”0″></iframe>

Appendix/Data Sources

Home prices: June 2016 median listing prices data provided by Zillow

Median income: Annual household income by age group and metropolitan area for 2014: U.S. Census Bureau.

Real Estate/Property Taxes: Real estate taxes for owner occupied units for metropolitan areas: U.S. Census Bureau

Mortgage interest rate: Bankrate.com National average on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage is 3.57% as of Sept. 1, 2016.

Downpayment: We assume a downpayment of 20%.

Savings rate: We assume homebuyers would save 20% of their annual take-home pay.

Closing costs: We assume closing costs of 4.5%.

Home Insurance rates by metro area: National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.

Mandi Woodruff
Mandi Woodruff |

Mandi Woodruff is a writer at MagnifyMoney. You can email Mandi at mandi@magnifymoney.com

TAGS: , , ,

Compare Mortgage Loan Offers for Free

Home Purchase Quotes

Home Refinance Quotes

(It only takes 3 minutes!)

NMLS #1136 Terms & Conditions Apply

Advertiser Disclosure

Featured, Personal Loans, Reviews

Marcus by Goldman Sachs Review: GS Bank Takes on Online Savings, CDs, and Personal Loans

Editorial Note: The editorial content on this page is not provided or commissioned by any financial institution. Any opinions, analyses, reviews, statements or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author’s alone, and may not have been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities prior to publication.

Year Established1990
Total Assets$179.2B
Most Americans probably think of fancy white-collar stock traders on Wall Street when they think of Goldman Sachs, a global investment firm that’s been around since the late 19th century.

In recent years, Goldman made a major pivot, launching a new arm of the company called GS Bank, which would provide internet-only savings accounts to the masses.

They also launched Marcus by Goldman Sachs®, a line of personal loans. Eventually, they decided to rebrand their savings account business, putting it under the Marcus umbrella as well.

Today, through Marcus, you’ll find three product offerings: personal loans, savings accounts, and CDs.

In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into all three products. We’ll tell you what you need to know before opening an account, including what rates they are offering.
Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s Most Popular Accounts

APY

Account Type

Account Name

3.10%

CD Rates

Goldman Sachs Bank USA High-yield 5 Year CD

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

2.75%

CD Rates

Goldman Sachs Bank USA High-yield 12 Month CD

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

2.25%

Savings

Goldman Sachs Bank USA High-yield Online Savings Account

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

Marcus by Goldman Sachs savings account

A very high interest rate and no fees make this one of the best savings accounts out there.

APY

Minimum Balance Amount

2.25%

None

  • Minimum opening deposit: None. However, you’ll need to deposit at least $1.00 if you want to earn any interest
  • Monthly account maintenance fee: None
  • ATM fee: N/A
  • ATM fee refund: N/A
  • Overdraft fee: None

This is a great account for almost anyone. However, before you click that “Learn More” button below, there are a couple of things to know.

No ATMs. First, Marcus by Goldman Sachs doesn’t offer ATM access to your savings account. You’ll either need to deposit or withdraw money by sending in a physical check, setting up direct deposits, or by moving the money to and from your other bank accounts via ACH or wire transfer.

No checking account. Second, Marcus does’t offer a corresponding checking account. That means you can only use this account as an external place to park your cash from your everyday money flow.

Keeping a separate savings account does have its benefits. For example, it’s harder to tempt yourself to withdraw the cash if you’re a chronic over-spender. But, it also means that there might be a delay of a few days if you need to transfer the money out of your Goldman Sachs online savings account and into your other checking account.

How to open a Goldman Sachs online savings account

It’s really easy to open an online savings account with Marcus by Goldman Sachs. You can do it online or over the phone as long as you’re 18 years or older, have a physical street address, and a Social Security Number or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number.

You’ll be required to sign a form which you can do online, or by mail if you’re opening the account over the phone.

LEARN MORE Secured

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

magnifying glass

How their online savings account compares

Marcus’ online savings account can easily be described with one word: outstanding.

You’ll get a relatively high interest rate with this account, which is among the best online savings account rates you’ll find today. In fact, these rates are currently over seven times higher than the average savings account interest rate.

Even better, this account won’t charge you any fees for the privilege of keeping your money stashed there. It’s a tall order to find another bank that offers these high interest rates with terms this good.

Marcus by Goldman Sachs CD rates

Sky-high CD rates, but watch out for early withdrawal limitations.

Term

APY

Minimum Deposit Amount

6 months

0.60%

$500

9 months

0.70%

$500

12 months

2.75%

$500

18 months

2.65%

$500

24 months

2.70%

$500

3 years

2.75%

$500

4 years

2.80%

$500

5 years

3.10%

$500

6 years

3.15%

$500

  • Minimum opening deposit: $500
  • Minimum balance amount to earn APY: $500
  • Early withdrawal penalty:
    • For CDs under 12 months, 90 days’ worth of interest
    • For CDs of 12 months to 5 years, 270 days’ worth of interest
    • For CDs of 5 years or over, 365 days’ worth of interest

Marcus’ CDs work a little differently from other CDs. Rather than having to set up and fund your account all at once, Goldman Sachs will give you 30 days to fully fund your account.

Once open, your interest will be tallied up and credited to your CD account each month. You can withdraw the interest earned at any time without paying an early withdrawal penalty, but heads up: If you withdraw the interest, your returns will be lower than the stated APY when you opened your account.

If you need to withdraw the money from your CD, you can only do so by pulling out the entire CD balance and paying the required early withdrawal penalty. There is no option for partial withdrawals of your cash.

Finally, once your CD has fully matured, you’ll have a 10-day grace period to withdraw the money, add more funds, and/or switch to a different CD term. If you don’t do anything, Marcus will automatically roll over your CD into another one of the same type, but with the current interest rate of the day.

How to open a Goldman Sachs CD

Marcus has made it super simple to open up a CD. First, you’ll need to be at least 18 years old, and have either a Social Security Number or an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number.

You can open an account easily online, or call them up by phone. You’ll need to sign an account opening form, which you can do online or via a hard-copy mailed form. Then, simply fund your CD account within 30 days, and you’re all set.

LEARN MORE Secured

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

magnifying glass

How their CDs compare

The interest rates that Marcus offers on their CDs are top-notch. In fact, a few of their CD terms are among the current contenders for the best CD rates.

If you’re interested in pursuing a CD ladder approach, Marcus is one of our top picks because each of their CD terms offer above-average rates. This means you can rest easy that you’ll get the best rates for your CD ladder without having to complicate things by spreading out all of your CDs among a handful of different banks.

The only downside to these CDs compared with many other banks is that you can’t withdraw a portion of your cash if you need it. It’s either all-in, or all-out. However, once out, you’re still free to open a new CD with the surplus cash, as long as it’s at least the $500 minimum deposit size.

Marcus by Goldman Sachs personal loan

Personal loans offered by Marcus have low APRs, flexible terms, and no fees.

Terms

APR

Credit Required

Fees

Max Loan Amount

36 to 72 months

5.99%-28.99%

Varies

None

$40,000

Marcus by Goldman Sachs® personal loans can be used for just about anything, from consolidating debt to financing a large home improvement project. They offer some of the best rates available, with APRs as low as 5.99%, and you’ll not only be able to choose between a range of loan terms, but you can also choose the specific day of the month when you want to make your loan payments.

While there are no specific credit requirements to get a loan through Marcus, the company does try to target those that have “prime” credit, which is usually those with a FICO score higher than 660. Even with a less than excellent credit score, you may be able to qualify for a personal loan from Marcus, though, those that have recent, negative marks on their credit report, such as missed payments, will likely be rejected.

Applicants must be over 18 (19 in Alabama and Nebraska, 21 in Mississippi and Puerto Rico) and have a valid U.S. bank account. You are also required to have a Social Security or Individual Tax I.D. Number.

No fees. Marcus charges no extra fees for their personal loans. There is No origination fee associated with getting a loan, but there are also no late fees associated with missing payments. Those missed payments simply accrue more interest and your loan will be extended.

Defer payments. Once you have made on-time payments for a full year, you will have the ability to defer a payment. This means that if an unexpected expense or lost job hurts your budget one month, you can push that payment back by a month without negatively impacting your credit report.

How to apply for a Marcus personal loan

Marcus by Goldman Sachs offers a process that is completely online, allowing you to apply, choose the loan you want, submit all of your documents, and get approved without having to leave home. Here are the steps that you will complete to get a personal loan from Marcus:

  1. Fill out the information that is required in the online application, including your basic personal and financial information, as well as how much you would like to borrow and what you will use the money for.
  2. After a soft pull on your credit, and if you qualify, you will be presented a list of different loan options that may include different rates and terms.
  3. Once you have chosen the loan you want, you will need to provide additional information to verify your identity. You may also be asked for information that can be used to verify your income and you will need to provide your bank account information so that the money can be distributed.
  4. You will receive your funds 1 – 4 business days after your loan has been approved.

SEE OFFERS Secured

on LendingTree’s secure website

magnifying glass

How their personal loans compare

Marcus offers low APRs and flexible terms with their personal loans, but their main feature is that they have no fees. If you are looking for a straightforward lending experience with no hidden fees or costs, Marcus will be perfect for you since you won’t even have to worry about late fees if you happen to miss a payment.

While Marcus offers some great perks, you may be able to get a lower rate if you choose to go with another lender, such as LightStream or SoFi. Both of these lenders offer lower APR ranges and they don’t charge origination fees, though, LightStreamwill do a hard pull on your credit to preapprove you.

LendingClub and Peerform both have lower credit requirements than Marcus, but they also charge origination fees and, being P2P lending platforms, you will need to wait for your loan to be funded and you run the risk that other users might not fund your loan.

Overall review of Marcus by Goldman Sachs‘ products

Marcus has really hit it out of the park with their personal loans, online savings, and CD accounts. Each of these accounts offers some of the best features available on the market, while shrinking the fees down to a minuscule, or even nonexistent, amount. Their website is also slick and easy to use for online-savvy people.

The only thing we can find to complain about with Marcus is that they don’t offer an equally-awesome checking account to accompany their other deposit products. Indeed, it seems like Marcus has turned their former hoity-toity image around: Today, they’re a bank that we’d recommend to anyone, even blue-collar folks.

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.

Lindsay VanSomeren
Lindsay VanSomeren |

Lindsay VanSomeren is a writer at MagnifyMoney. You can email Lindsay here

TAGS: ,

Advertiser Disclosure

Credit Cards, Featured, News

Average U.S. Credit Card Debt in 2019

Editorial Note: The editorial content on this page is not provided or commissioned by any financial institution. Any opinions, analyses, reviews, statements or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author’s alone, and may not have been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities prior to publication.

Updated – January 23, 2019

Credit card balances are at all-time highs. Rate increases by the Federal Reserve (four in 2018, with more likely to come this year) will mean consumers pay billions more in interest charges.

We’ve updated our statistics on credit card debt in America to illustrate how much consumers are now taking on.

  • Americans paid banks $110 billion in credit card interest and fees in 2018, up 13% from the $98 billion in interest paid in 2017, and up 45% over the last five years, as Fed rate increases have been passed on to consumers. MagnifyMoney analyzed FDIC data through September 2018 for each bank whose deposits are insured by the FDIC.
  • The four Federal Reserve rate increases in 2018 meant most credit card Annual Percentage Rates (APRs) increased a full percentage point more last year. With more Fed rate hikes still likely in 2019, we estimate the increase in interest paid in the coming will continue to grow, putting Americans on track to pay over $122 billion in interest in 2019, an additional $12 billion more than the $110 billion currently being paid annually. Our analysis of the impact of Fed rate hikes found credit card rates are the most sensitive to Fed rate hikes, rising more than twice as fast as mortgage rates.
  • Average APRs on credit card accounts assessed interest are now 16.86%, up nearly 4 percentage points in five years, according to the Federal Reserve.

  • Total revolving credit balances are $1.04 trillion as of November 2018. The figure, reported monthly by the Federal Reserve, is the total amount of revolving credit balances reported by financial institutions, the overwhelming majority of which are credit and retail card balances, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). As of March 2018, non-card-related revolving balances such as overdraft lines of credit were approximately $74 billion, according to our analysis of the FDIC data used by the Federal Reserve to calculate total revolving balances.

  • Americans carry $686 billion in credit card debt that is not paid in full each month. This estimate includes people paying interest, as well as those carrying a balance on a card with a 0% intro rate. We based the estimate on a CFPB study of credit card account data that found 29% of total credit card balances are paid off each month, implying 71% of credit card balances revolve each month. We applied the percentage to the Federal Reserve’s revolving credit balance data less $74 billion in non-credit card revolving debt to reach $686 billion in credit card balances carried over month to month.
  • 43.8% of credit card accounts aren’t paid in full each month, according to the American Bankers Association. Those who don’t pay in full tend to have higher balances, which is why the percentage of balances not paid in full (71%) is higher than the percentage of accounts not paid in full (43.8%).
  • The average credit card balance is $6,348 for individuals with a credit card, according to Experian. This excludes store credit cards, which have an average balance of $1,841. Both figures include the statement balances of individuals who pay their balance in full each month.

Credit card use

  • Number of Americans who actively use credit cards: 176 million as of 2018, according to Transunion.
  • Average number of credit cards per consumer: 3.1, according to Experian. That doesn’t include an average of 2.5 retail credit cards.
  • Number of Americans who carry credit card debt month to month: 70 million.

Credit card debt

The following estimates only include the credit card balances of those who carry credit card debt from month to month — they exclude balances of those who pay in full each month.

  • Total credit card debt in the U.S. (not paid in full each month): $686 billion
  • Average APR: 16.86% (also excludes those with a 0% promotional rate for a balance transfer or purchases)
    • This estimate comes from the Federal Reserve’s monthly reporting of APRs on accounts assessed interest by banks.

Credit card balances

The following figures include the credit card statement balances of all credit card users, including those who pay their bill in full each month.

  • Total credit card balances: Nearly $1.04 trillion as of November 2018, an increase of 2.3% from November 2017. This includes credit and retail cards, and a small amount of overdraft line of credit balances.
  • Average credit card balance: $6,358, according to Experian (excludes retail credit cards, which have lower balances. The average consumer has $1,841 in balances on retail cards and we estimate combining all consumers with retail or credit card debt the average is approximately $5,000 per individual). All averages include those who pay their bill in full each month.

Who pays off their credit card bills?

According to the American Bankers Association, in 2018, accounts that are paid in full versus carrying debt month to month comprise the following mix of open credit card accounts:

  • Revolvers (carry debt month to month): 43.8% of credit card accounts
  • Transactors (use card, but pay in full): 30.4% of credit card accounts
  • Dormant (have a card, but don’t use it actively): 25.8% of credit card accounts

Delinquency rates

Credit card debt becomes delinquent when a bank reports a missed payment to the major credit reporting bureaus. Banks typically don’t report a missed payment until a person is at least 30 days late in paying. When a consumer doesn’t pay for at least 90 days, the credit card balance becomes seriously delinquent. Banks are very likely to take a total loss on seriously delinquent balances.

Delinquency rates peaked in 2009 at nearly 7%, but in 2018 they have remained below 2.5%.

Debt burden by income

Those with the highest credit card debts aren’t necessarily the most financially insecure. According to the 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances, the top 10% of income earners who carried credit card debt had nearly twice as much debt as the average.

However, people with lower incomes have more burdensome credit card debt loads. Consumers in the lowest earning quintile had an average credit card debt of $2,100. However, their debt-to-income ratio was 13.9%. On the high end, earners in the top decile had an average of $12,500 in credit card debt. But debt-to-income ratio was just 4.8%.

Income Percentile

Median Income

Average CC Debt

CC Debt: Income Ratio

0%-20%

$15,100

$2,100

13.9%

20%-40%

$31,400

$3,800

12.1%

40%-60%

$52,700

$4,400

8.3%

60%-80%

$86,100

$6,800

7.9%

80%-90%

$136,000

$8,700

6.4%

90%-100%

$260,200

$12,500

4.8%

 

Although high-income earners have more manageable credit card debt loads on average, they aren’t taking steps to pay off the debt faster than lower income debt carriers. In fact, high-income earners are as likely to pay the minimum as those with below average incomes. If an economic recession leads to job losses at all wage levels, we could see high levels of credit card debt in default.

Generational differences in credit card use

In 2017, Generation X surpassed the baby boomer generation to have the highest credit card balances. Experian estimates that on average, Generation X has a balance of $7,750 per person, 21.94% more than the national average ($6,354). Boomers carry nearly as much as Generation X with an average balance of $7,550.

At the other end of the spectrum, millennials, who are often characterized as frivolous spenders and are too quick to take on debt, have nearly the lowest credit card balances. Their median balance clocks in at $4,315. The youngest generation, Gen Z, has the smallest average balance of $2,047 per person.

How does your state compare?

Using data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel and Equifax, you can compare median credit card balances and credit card delinquency.

State

Credit Card Debt Per Debtor

Credit Card Debt Per House

Alabama

$3,710.56

$7,198.48

Alaska

$5,879.85

$11,406.91

Arizona

$4,299.70

$8,341.42

Arkansas

$3,289.01

$6,380.69

California

$4,569.51

$8,864.85

Colorado

$4,898.56

$9,503.20

Connecticut

$5,171.89

$10,033.47

Delaware

$4,338.88

$8,417.42

Florida

$4,318.35

$8,377.59

Georgia

$4,727.46

$9,171.27

Hawaii

$5,330.46

$10,341.09

Idaho

$3,791.84

$7,356.18

Illinois

$4,412.71

$8,560.65

Indiana

$3,624.05

$7,030.65

Iowa

$3,169.16

$6,148.17

Kansas

$3,854.05

$7,476.85

Kentucky

$3,457.67

$6,707.88

Louisiana

$3,767.91

$7,309.75

Maine

$3,905.56

$7,576.78

Maryland

$5,287.61

$10,257.96

Massachusetts

$4,720.53

$9,157.83

Michigan

$3,458.51

$6,709.51

Minnesota

$4,257.26

$8,259.08

Mississippi

$3,204.95

$6,217.60

Missouri

$3,763.46

$7,301.11

Montana

$3,732.83

$7,241.69

Nebraska

$3,594.46

$6,973.25

Nevada

$4,263.19

$8,270.59

New Hampshire

$4,943.44

$9,590.27

New Jersey

$5,361.06

$10,400.47

New Mexico

$4,185.93

$8,120.71

New York

$4,969.84

$9,641.50

North Carolina

$4,124.04

$8,000.63

North Dakota

$3,756.19

$7,287.00

Ohio

$3,738.95

$7,253.56

Oklahoma

$4,038.90

$7,835.47

Oregon

$3,881.17

$7,529.48

Pennsylvania

$4,209.21

$8,165.86

Rhode Island

$4,376.34

$8,490.10

South Carolina

$4,187.65

$8,124.04

South Dakota

$3,608.28

$7,000.07

Tennessee

$3,903.24

$7,572.28

Texas

$4,937.00

$9,577.78

Utah

$3,775.21

$7,323.92

Vermont

$4,199.77

$8,147.56

Virginia

$5,404.32

$10,484.38

Washington

$4,568.09

$8,862.09

West Virginia

$3,381.36

$6,559.84

Wisconsin

$3,410.29

$6,615.96

Wyoming

$3,944.72

$7,652.76

 

State

Silent

Boomers

Gen X

Millennials

Gen Z

Alaska

$5,456

$9,495

$8,995

$4,464


$1,518


Alabama

$3,511

$6,461

$6,485


$3,324


$1,455




Arkansas

$3,194

$5,995

$6,197


$3,240


$1,803


Arizona

$4,149

$6,967

$6,778


$3,575


$1,555


California

$4,232

$7,050

$6,578


$3,654


$1,596


Colorado

$4,004

$7,499

$7,439


$3,833



$1,514


Connecticut

$4,091

$8,179

$8,046


$3,716



$2,567


Dist. of Columbia

$5,486

$7,976

$7,393


$4,596



$2,814


Delaware

$4,147

$7,128

$7,144


$3,285



$1,608


Florida

$4,311

$7,047

$6,615


$3,639



$1,837


Georgia

$4,356

$7,517

$6,972


$3,540


$1,835


Hawaii

$4,386

$7,073

$7,355


$4,203


$1,657


Iowa

$2,367

$5,297

$6,163


$2,857


$935


Idaho

$3,477

$6,147

$6,332


$3,193


$928


Illinois

$3,641

$7,054

$7,040


$3,537


$1,556


Indiana

$3,137

$5,998

$6,174


$3,003


$1,402


Kansas

$3,187

$6,514

$6,930


$3,292


$1,421


Kentucky

$3,044

$5,727

$6,080


$3,082


$1,372


Louisiana

$3,679

$6,598

$6,561


$3,425


$1,971


Massachusetts

$3,481

$7,017

$7,022


$3,479

$1,882


Maryland

$4,341

$7,994

$7,458


$3,671


$1,749


Maine

$3,107

$6,054

$6,531


$3,375


$1,286


Michigan

$3,436

$6,049

$6,113


$2,971


$1,523


Minnesota

$3,025

$6,299

$6,898


$3,244


$1,338


Missouri

$3,265

$6,333

$6,757


$3,279


$1,346


Mississippi

$3,218

$5,634

$5,718


$3,043


$2,011


Montana

$3,285

$5,977

$6,868


$3,385


$1,506


North Carolina

$3,481

$6,566

$6,710


$3,397


$1,486


North Dakota

$2,141

$5,362

$6,646


$3,326


$1,467


Nebraska

$2,717

$5,909

$6,498


$3,136


$1,388


New Hampshire

$3,582

$7,140

$7,443


$3,519


$1,666


New Jersey

$4,126

$8,011

$7,882


$3,928


$2,241


New Mexico

$4,373

$6,906

$6,534


$3,532


$1,207


Nevada

$4,733

$6,993

$6,357


$3,700


$1,185


New York

$3,906

$7,127

$7,234


$3,986


$2,495


Ohio

$3,313

$6,383

$6,530


$3,135


$1,465


Oklahoma

$3,484

$6,789

$6,900


$3,493


$1,641


Oregon

$3,618

$6,502

$6,481


$3,245


$856


Pennsylvania

$3,282

$6,550

$7,059

$3,457


$1,545


Rhode Island

$3,524

$7,162

$7,313


$3,371


$1,786


South Carolina

$4,019

$6,537

$6,559


$3,281

$1,375


South Dakota

$2,584

$5,710

$6,900

$3,250


$1,531


Tennessee

$3,388

$6,309

$6,505


$3,308


$1,737


Texas

$4,350

$7,591

$7,119


$3,779


$1,945


Utah

$3,364

$6,411

$6,713


$3,070


$932


Virginia

$4,132

$7,956

$7,968


$3,985

$1,692


Vermont

$3,681

$6,197

$6,547


$3,297


$2,511


Washington

$3,947

$7,365

$7,190


$3,500


$1,355


Wisconsin

$2,740

$5,673

$6,289


$2,914


$992


West Virginia

$2,914

$5,573

$6,158


$3,238


$1,166


Wyoming

$3,523

$6,356

$6,889

$3,663

$1,442

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.

MagnifyMoney
MagnifyMoney |

Have a question to ask or a story to share? Contact the MagnifyMoney team at info@magnifymoney.com

TAGS: