Advertiser Disclosure

News

10 Places You Can Earn Six Figures and Still Feel Broke in 2018

Editorial Note: The content of this article is based on the author’s opinions and recommendations alone. It has not been previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any of our network partners.

Written By

 

iStock

A six-figure income may not go as far as you think depending on where you live. After factoring in taxes, debt payment and living expenses like child care and transportation, a family earning $100,000 in certain cities could still find themselves struggling to get by. Last year, MagnifyMoney published “The Best and Worst Cities to Live on Six Figures.” This year, we’re back for the 2018 edition to uncover the metro areas where a household income of $100,000 can still leave you strapped for cash.

For this study, we created a hypothetical, but fairly typical, couple with one child who earns a combined gross income of $100,000 (or $8,333 monthly). We estimated monthly expenses, debt payments and tax obligations to calculate what the family’s disposable income would be in various metro areas based on the average lifestyle of a six-figure earner in the corresponding metro area. Then, we ranked the locations from places where they would have the most and least disposable income.

The order in this year’s ranking has changed from last year due to changes in living costs like housing, transportation and child care. But you’ll notice many usual suspects on the worst list and some familiar faces on the best list.

Places Where You Can Earn 6 Figures and Still Be Broke

How the study — and our findings — evolved in 2018

There are a few changes to the methodology in our 2018 study. We focused on the largest 100 metros this time around as opposed to some 381 metros last year. We also took a more detailed approach to calculating variables that impact a family’s disposable income. Here are the updates we made:

We based our case study on a family earning a gross income of $8,333 per month. Then we subtracted their monthly expenses, debt obligations and savings to come up with an estimate of how much cash they’d have left over at the end of the month.

Savings. We assumed the family contributed $500 monthly to their 401(k). Last year, we assumed the family set aside 5% of their savings in a regular savings account. This year, we changed the savings to 401(k) contributions because it’s something of a bastion of corporate middle-class personal finance, and it offers a tax benefit.

Tax assumptions. Our study assumes the couple will file jointly for 2018. They took the standard federal deduction and received a federal $2,000 credit for their one child. They also took the standard deductions and credits offered by their state, and took advantage of the pretax DCFSA child savings plan to deduct the $5,000 maximum from their taxable income by their employer. The couple had insurance premiums paid from their pretax income by their employer and their 401(k) contributions paid from their pretax income by their employer.

Debt: We assume the family had a monthly student loan payment of $222, which is the median student loan payment according to the Federal Reserve. Housing and auto debt are bundled in with the housing and transportation cost budget line items in monthly expenses.

Monthly expenses. We based monthly expenses — housing, transportation, food, utilities, household operations, child care and entertainment — for each location on data taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Care.com, Kaiser Family Foundation and the Federal Reserve. We calculated an average for these expenses taking into account the lifestyle costs of a six-figure earner.

Compared with last year, we beefed up the monthly necessity expenses — although by no means hit them all — by adding costs like household operations costs and utilities to get a more realistic sense of how much people would have left over after paying their basic bills. We also added health insurance since it’s one of the most basic expenses.

Read the full methodology here.

Key takeaways:

  • In San Jose, Calif. (the seat of Silicon Valley), a joint income of $100,000 with a preschool-aged child means a couple would have to run up their credit cards $454 a month just to make monthly bills on the basics (not including compounded interest on that credit card debt)
  • In McAllen, Texas, a couple earning $100,000 can expect to have around $2,267 left over every month after paying bills.
  • In fact, the five places where couples can expect the most in disposable income are in Texas and Tennessee, where there’s no state income tax, and metros in Florida (also without state income tax) tend to have six-figure earners with plenty of money left over.
  • Regionally, with the exception of Minneapolis — a perennial on our list of most prosperous places — the most expensive cities lie on the coasts and Hawaii, and the most affordable cities are in Southern states without a state income tax.

Worst Places to Make Six Figures

1. San Jose/Sunnyvale/Santa Clara, Calif.

San Jose, Calif., moves up to the top spot replacing Washington D.C. from last year’s study. San Jose is the location where a combined income of $100,000 is going to offer the least amount of security for our hypothetical family of three.

To make ends meet, they would need to either dip into savings or rely on credit cards to cover the $454 budget deficit. Housing in this area decreased compared with last year ($2,916 in 2017 versus $2,520 in 2018). However, an 84% increase on child care costs and 30% increase on transportation costs takes the location to the no. 1 spot. This year, we used a different source for child care costs, which could also contribute to the increase in cost.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,087
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA, 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,768

2. Washington/Arlington/Alexandria, DC-VA-MD

Washington D.C. comes in at a close second leaving the family $360 in the hole each month. Housing costs increased to $2,597 compared with $2,274 in 2017. This is the most expensive metro area to find living arrangements. The general rule of thumb is to not spend more than 30% of your gross income on housing, but this recommendation could leave you house poor since it doesn’t consider your net income.

In this case, housing takes up about 31% of the couple’s gross income ($8,333 per month). However, housing takes up 47% of the family’s actual paycheck after subtracting taxes, FICA, 401(k), health insurance and the pre-tax child care saving incentive. Couple the housing costs with the transportation expense ($1,302), and a six-figure earning family can really struggle to live comfortably in and around the nation’s capital.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,932
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA, 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,560

3. San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward, CA

San Francisco is about 50 miles away from San Jose (no. 1 on the list), but offers slightly lower living costs, which makes the $100,000 income go a bit further. The two cities share almost the exact same monthly expenses. It’s the $320 total saved on housing and transportation that makes San Francisco slightly more affordable than the San Jose metro area. San Francisco made it to no. 4 last year, so it’s no surprise we’re seeing it again this year taking one of the top spots.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,086
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,768

4. Bridgeport/Stamford/Norwalk, Conn.

The Bridgeport, Conn., area offers some opportunity for savings in food and child care costs, but estimated utilities and transportation costs come in higher than even the top three worst places for six-figure earners. Our hypothetical family would spend almost 29%* of their paycheck on transportation and utilities alone.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,035
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,678

5. Boston/Cambridge/Newton, MA-NH

Boston has the third highest cost of child care to make the list. Child care could take up a whopping 15%* of a family’s paycheck after subtracting taxes and savings contributions. Just like last year, housing is another budget buster in the Boston area eating away another 37% of their paycheck.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,932
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,595

6. Oxnard/Thousand Oaks/Ventura, Calif.

Oxnard, Calif., is a new addition to the list this year, and the first metro area that doesn’t leave a $100,000 earning household in the red each month after taxes, investment contributions and expenses.

With that said, disposable income of just $138 isn’t much to write home about. An unexpected expense could easily wipe out their spare cash. Like the other California locales above, housing takes a huge bite out of their budget — almost 38% of net income.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,086
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings— $5,768

7. Urban Honolulu, Hawaii

Honolulu gives the family more disposable income than Oxnard, Calif., but just barely. When all expenses are covered, the family has $140 left over to spare, which is less than last year’s disposable income of $302. Year over year, child care and transportation costs increased by 30% and 23% respectively, but housing decreased by almost 18%.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,805
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,527

8. Minneapolis/St. Paul/Bloomington, MN-WI**

State income tax is one of several reasons the Minneapolis area makes the list. The estimated state tax here ($506) is higher than the top two worst places — San Jose ($206 state tax) and Washington, D.C. ($366 state tax). Housing takes up about 37% of the family’s paycheck, which isn’t ideal but less than other locations.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,785
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA, 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,470**

9. Hartford/West Hartford/East Hartford, Conn.

Hartford, Conn., is another new addition to the list. Hartford offers $339 in disposable income which is more than double that of Honolulu. Housing in Hartford is the second lowest of this list taking up just 33% of the family’s paycheck.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,035
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,678

10. New York/Newark/Jersey City/NY-NJ-PA

The New York metro area came in no. 5 last year, but takes spot no. 10 for 2018. It may come as a shock that it’s not closer to the top, but major savings in transportation contributes to a disposable income of $505 after bills and other responsibilities.

For a comparison, the other “worst places to live” have monthly transportation costs ranging from $1,200 to $1,400. The estimate for transportation costs in the New York area is just $997 per month.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,934
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,629

Best Places to Make Six Figures

100. McAllen/Edinburg/Mission, Texas

It’s no surprise that states without state income tax make the top of the list for best places to make six-figures. McAllen also has a remarkably low monthly housing cost ($889). Last year, housing costs for McAllen were sitting at $1,086 contributing to its no. 5 ranking on the best list.

Here, the family has a nice $2,267 per month in disposable income. This surplus in cash can offer plenty of flexibility to save, invest or tackle lingering debt. Overall, household bills take up just 62%* of the paycheck in McAllen. In comparison, for San Jose, the worst metro area for six-figure earners, bills take up 108%* of the paycheck.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,300
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, childcare savings — $5,913

99. El Paso, Texas

El Paso, Texas, has a slightly higher housing cost than McAllen ($1,060 versus McAllen’s $889). In El Paso, the hypothetical family gets a disposable income of $2,135, again, enough to comfortably stash some cash away for a rainy day while keeping current on bills.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,301
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,913

98. Chattanooga, TN-GA

Chattanooga, Tenn., offers low child care and health insurance, but comes in third with a disposable income of $2,048 thanks to the higher housing cost ($1,116) and transportation cost ($1,186) . These two major living expenses are higher than McAllen and El Paso, but when combined still only take up 39% of net income.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,290
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,894

97. Memphis, TN-MS-AR

Memphis has higher housing costs than the locations above but more affordable child care. Child care ($622 per month) is lower than even the two best metro areas — McAllen and El Paso (both $686 per month). The family gets a disposable income of $1,970, which is a respectable sum.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,290
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,984

96. Knoxville, Tenn.

Knoxville, Tenn., is yet another southern metro area in a state with no income tax. Housing and child care costs put Knoxville behind Chattanooga and Memphis. But together, housing and child care costs, two big ticket budget line items, only eat up about 31% of the household’s paycheck.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,290
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,984

95. Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla.

The monthly disposable income at Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla., clocks in at $1,850. The health care costs ($525) are considerably higher here when compared with other cities even the most expensive places for six-figure earners. San Jose, Calif., and Washington, D.C., have health care costs of $402 and $456, respectively.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,306
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,866

94. Jackson, Miss.

Jackson, Miss., is the first locale on the best places to live list that has a state income tax. Jackson offers a disposable income that’s just two dollars shy of Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla. at $1,848. Despite the state tax, housing ($1,082 per month) and child care ($514 per month), it’s still an affordable place to call home for six-figure earners.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $6,993
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,627

93. Youngstown/Warren/Boardman, OH-PA

Youngstown, Pa., is the only location representing the Northeastern states in this list. Child care is high ($694) compared with other states that have affordable living. But housing and transportation costs are comparable with other locales, and health care is noticeably lower at $331 per month.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,069
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,823

92. Deltona/Daytona Beach/Ormond Beach, Fla.

Daytona Beach, Fla., is in a no-income tax state but has high housing, transportation and food costs, which takes it down a few pegs even below two states that have state taxes. Bills take up 70%* of net income.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,306
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,866

91. Toledo, Ohio

Toledo, Ohio, rounds out the top ten best places for six-figure income households. Like, Youngstown, Pa., Toledo has high child care costs ($694 per month) when compared with the other affordable locations. Food and entertainment costs can also put some pressure on the purse strings. But overall, the household will pay just 70%* of their paycheck on household expenses.

  • Monthly income minus taxes and FICA — $7,069
  • Monthly paycheck minus taxes, FICA 401(k), health insurance, DCFSA child savings — $5,823

*These numbers have been corrected due to an editing error.

**Due to a data collection error, the health insurance costs for Minneapolis were incorrectly calculated. We have updated the ranking for Minneapolis from #5 to #8. 

Additional Findings:

  • Residents of the New York metro (10th on the list) get a bit of a reprieve, thanks to low cost public transportation. They’ll have $505 left over every month for things like clothes, toys, and co-pays for their kid.
  • Other states with no income tax include Nevada, Vermont and Washington, but expenses there are high enough to eat up most of the savings (Seattle is the 13th brokest metro).

Background & methodology:

The hypothetical family we created is a typical one that earns a combined income of $100,000 (the median income for a married-couple family in 2016 was $81,917, and 39% of such couples earned at least $100,000 that same year).

We were pretty conservative about the couple’s financial and debt obligations by making the following assumptions:

  • Both have corporate-style employers who offer typical benefits.
  • They have one child currently in day care.
  • Between them, they contribute 6% of their income to their 401(k)’s, which is considerably less than the median rate of 5% from an employee in a matching plan (page 40; assumes the employee is contributing half of the 10% median).
  • Only one of them has student loans and is making the median payment of $222 a month.
  • The entire household is on one person’s group insurance plan.
  • The family has average spending habits and expenses for where they live.

To calculate federal and state taxes, we assumed the following:

  • The couple will file jointly for 2018;
  • Took the standard federal deduction;
  • Received a federal $2,000 credit for their one child
  • Took the standard deductions and credits offered by their state;
  • Took advantage of the pre-tax DCFSA child savings plan to deduct the $5,000 maximum from their taxable income by their employer;
  • Had insurance premiums paid from their pre-tax income by their employer;
  • Had their 401(k) contributions paid from their pre-tax income by their employer.

The following variables were used to create their hypothetical expenses (each is the average cost for the geography indicated in parentheses):

  • Federal tax contribution (national, but adjusted for state average health care premiums)
  • State tax contribution (state)
  • FICA contribution (national)
  • 401(k) contribution (national; see notes on assumptions)
  • Insurance premiums (state)
  • Housing costs (MSA)
  • Transportation costs (MSA)
  • Food costs (regional)
  • Utilities cost (regional)
  • Household operations costs (regional)
  • Child care costs (MSAs where available (half of the MSAs), and state averages where not)
  • Student loan payments (national)
  • Entertainment costs (regional)

Sources include the Bureau of Labor Statistics; the Department of Housing and Urban Development; the Tax Foundation; Care.com; the Kaiser Family Foundation; the U.S. Federal Reserve; and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Full ranking:

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.

Advertiser Disclosure

News

The Trump Tax Plan Explained

Editorial Note: The content of this article is based on the author’s opinions and recommendations alone. It has not been previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any of our network partners.

Written By

Reviewed By

When the Trump tax plan, formally known as The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), was enacted in 2017, taxes changed drastically for many Americans. Noted as the most sweeping rewrite of the tax code in more than three decades, the tax reform implemented new federal income tax brackets and doubled the standard deduction, among many other changes.

The majority of the Trump tax plan’s changes went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018, which means most Americans felt the impact of the TCJA for the first time when they filed their 2019 taxes.

What the Trump tax plan changed

Some of the changes made by the Trump tax plan may already be familiar to you, but here you can read about all of the changes it introduced or jump ahead to read about the rules you’re most interested in:

A 529 college savings plan is a tax-advantaged savings account designed to encourage saving for qualified future higher-education costs, such as tuition, fees and room and board. Your money is invested and grows tax free.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Previously, 529 plan savings could only be used on qualified higher education expenses.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

In a major victory for wealthier families, you can now use 529 savings for private K-12 schooling.

Tax benefits are now extended to eligible education expenses for an elementary or secondary public, private, or religious school.

The new rules allow you to withdraw up to $10,000 a year per student (child) for education costs.

The individual mandate was a key provision of the Affordable Care Act that required non-exempt U.S. citizens and noncitizens who lawfully reside in the country to have health insurance.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2019)

Consumers who did not qualify for an exemption and chose not to purchase insurance faced a range of tax penalties, depending on income.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2019)

The individual mandate is out.

Starting Jan. 1, 2019, consumers who do not purchase health insurance will no longer face penalties.

GOP lawmakers argue that the measure will decrease spending on the tax subsidies it offers to balance out the cost of premiums for millions of Obamacare enrollees.

However, without the mandate, experts caution that fewer healthy and young people will sign up for health coverage through the insurance marketplace, which will likely lead to increases in premium costs for those who remain the marketplace and could even induce some insurers to drop out of the market altogether. It’s a big blow to supporters of the long-embattled health care law.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2019)

The individual paying alimony or maintenance payments could deduct payments from their income. The person receiving the payments included them as income.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2019)

The person making alimony or maintenance payments does not get to deduct them, and the recipient does not claim the payments as income. This goes into effect for any divorce or separation agreement signed or modified on or after Jan. 1, 2019.

The individual alternative minimum tax, or AMT, often imposed on higher-income families, especially those with children, who live in high-tax states — but not necessarily the ultra rich. It requires many households or individuals to calculate their tax due under the AMT rules alongside the rules for regular income tax. They have to pay the higher amount. Whether or not a someone pays AMT depends on their alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). AMTI is determined through a series of assessments of a taxpayer’s income and assets — the explanation of calculating AMTI takes up two pages in the tax bill, so we’re not getting into the details here.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The exemption amount was $84,500 for married joint-filing couples, $54,300 for single filers and $42,250 for married couples filing separately.

The AMT exemption began to phase out at $120,700 for singles, $160,900 for married couples filing jointly and $80,450 for married couples filing separately.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The AMT is here to stay but fewer households will have to face it.

Under the new rules, which are in effect from Jan. 1, 2018 through Dec. 31, 2025, married couples filing jointly will be exempt from the alternative minimum tax starting at $109,400. Exemption starts at $70,300 for all other taxpayers (other than estates and trusts).

The exemption phase-out thresholds will rise to $1,000,000 for married couples filing jointly, and $500,000 for all other taxpayers.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Taxpayers could exclude up to $20 a month of qualified bicycle commuting reimbursements from their gross income. That included payments from employers for things like a bicycle purchase, bike maintenance or storage. Workers could claim the exclusion in any month they regularly use a bicycle to commute to work and do not receive other transit benefits.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The exclusion is suspended through 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The child tax credit was $1,000 per child under the age of 17.

The credit was reduced by $50 for each $1,000 a taxpayer earned over certain thresholds. The phase-out thresholds started at a modified adjusted gross income (AGI) over $75,000 for single individuals and heads of household, $110,000 for married couples filing jointly and $55,000 for married couples filing separately.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The child tax credit doubles to $2,000 per qualifying child. Up to $1,400 of the child tax credit can be received as refundable credit (meaning it can go toward a tax refund). The new rule also includes a $500 nonrefundable credit per dependent other than a qualifying child.

The credit begins to phase out at an AGI over $200,000 — for married couples, the phase-out starts at an AGI over $400,000.

This rule is in effect through 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Under a four-step graduated rate structure, the top corporate tax rate was 35 percent on taxable income greater than $10 million.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Permanently cuts the top corporate tax rate to 21 percent.

The estate tax, aka the “Death Tax” is a tax levied on significantly large estates that are passed down to heirs.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Estates up to $5.49 million in value were exempt from the tax.

The top tax rate was 40 percent.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Doubles the exemption for the estate tax.

Now, estates up to $11.2 million are exempt from the tax.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Homeowners could exclude up to $250,000 (or $500,000, if married filing jointly) of gains made when selling their primary residence, as long as they owned and primarily lived in the home for at least two of the five years before the sale. The exclusion could be claimed only once in a two-year period.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Homeowners can still exclude gains up to $250,000 (or $500,000 if married filing jointly) when they sell their primary residence, but they have to have lived there longer. People who sell their homes after Dec. 31, 2017 now have to use the home as their primary residence for five of the eight years before the sale in order to claim the exclusion. It can only be claimed once in a five-year period.

The new rule expires on Dec. 31, 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule

Taxpayers were previously allowed to deduct out-of-pocket medical expenses that exceed 10 percent of their adjusted gross income or 7.5 percent if they or their spouse were 65 or older.

New Rule

The threshold for all taxpayers to claim an itemized deduction for medical expenses is lowered to 7.5 percent of a filer’s adjusted gross income.

The change applies to taxable years from Dec. 31, 2016 to Jan. 1, 2019.

Taxpayers can take the miscellaneous tax deduction if the items total more than 2 percent of their adjusted gross income. The amount that’s deductible is the amount that exceeds the 2 percent threshold. These are some of the major changes coming to the miscellaneous tax deduction.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Tax preparation: Taxpayers could claim an itemized deduction of the amount of money they pay for tax-related expenses, like the person who prepares their taxes or any software purchased pr fees paid to fee to file forms electronically.

Work-related expenses: Workers could deduct unreimbursed business expense as an itemized deduction, like the cost of a home office, job-search costs, professional license fees and more.

Investment fees: Taxpayers could deduct fees paid to advisors and brokers to manage their money.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Tax preparation: Taxpayers may not claim tax-preparation expenses as an itemized deduction through 2025.

Work-related expenses: The bill suspends work-related expenses as an itemized deduction through 2025.

Investment fees: Under the new rules, the investment fee deduction is suspended until 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Homeowners were allowed to deduct interest paid on mortgages valued up to $1 million on a taxpayer’s principal residence and one other qualified residence.

They could also deduct interest paid on a home equity loan or home equity line of credit no greater than $100,000. These were itemized deductions.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

New homeowners can include mortgage interest paid on up to $750,000 of principal value on a new home in their itemized deductions.

The old, $1 million caps continues to apply to current homeowners (those who took out their mortgages on or before Dec. 15, 2017), as well as refinancing on mortgages taken out on or before Dec. 15, 2017, as long as new mortgage amount does not exceed the amount of debt being refinanced.

Homeowners CAN deduct interest paid on a home equity line of credit or home equity loan, so long as the loan was used to buy, build or substantially improve your home.

These changes are set to expire after 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Previous tax law allowed taxpayers to deduct moving expenses as long as the move was of a certain distance from the taxpayer’s previous home and the job in the new location is full-time.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The new tax bill suspends the moving expense deduction through 2025. Until then, taxpayers are not permitted to deduct moving expenses.

Moving-related deductions and exclusions remain in place for members of the military.

Pass-through businesses are generally small businesses (also some big firms) that don’t pay the corporate income tax. Instead, the owners report the corporate profits as their own income and pay taxes based on the individual tax rates along with their regular personal income tax.

Some of the common types of pass-through businesses are partnerships, LLCs (limited liability companies), S corporations and sole proprietorships.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

All pass-through business owners’ income was previously subject to regular personal income tax.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Under the new laws, pass-through business owners can deduct up to 20 percent of their qualified business income from a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship.

Individuals earning $157,500 and married couples earning $315,000 are eligible for the fullest deduction.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Individuals could deduct uninsured losses above $100 when property was lost to a fire, shipwreck, flood, storm, earthquake or other natural disaster. The deduction was allowed as long as the total loss amounted to greater than 10 percent of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The new tax bill only allows taxpayers to claim the deduction if the loss occurred during a federally declared disaster, through 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Taxpayers could reduce their adjusted gross income by claiming personal exemptions — generally for the taxpayer, their spouse and their dependents.

Taxpayers could deduct $4,050 per exemption in 2017, though the deduction was phased out for taxpayers earning more than certain AGI thresholds. The phase out began at an AGI over $313,800 for married couples filing jointly, $287,650 for heads of household, $156,900 for married couples filing separately and $261,500 for all other taxpayers.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Personal exemptions have been suspended through 2025.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Taxpayers who did not itemize could claim the current standard deduction of $6,350 for single individuals, $9,350 for heads of household or $12,700 for married couples filing jointly

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Standard deductions for all nearly double under the new rules.

Individuals see standard deductions rise to $12,000; forlim heads of household, it rises to $18,000; and for married couples filing jointly the standard deduction increases to $24,000.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Taxpayers had the option of including state and local property, income and sales taxes as itemized deductions.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Taxpayers are limited to claiming an itemized deduction of $10,000 in combined state and local income, sales and property taxes, starting in 2018 through 2025.

Taxpayers cannot get around these limits by prepaying 2018 state and local income taxes while it is still 2017. The bill says nothing about prepaying 2018 property taxes.

Old Rule

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Student loan debt discharged due to death or disability was taxed as income.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

Under the new tax bill, student loan debt discharged due to death or disability after Dec. 31, 2017, will not be taxed as income. The rule lasts through 2025.

The table below shows the difference between the tax rates and brackets before the Trump tax plan went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018 and after.

Tax Rules Pre-TCJA

Tax Rules Post-TCJA

Before 2018, there were seven tax brackets.

The rate on the highest earners was 39.6 percent for taxpayers earning above $418,400 for individuals and $470,700 for married couples filing taxes jointly.

New Rule (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)

The new rules retain seven tax brackets, but the brackets have been modified to lower most individual income tax rates. The new brackets expire in 2027.

Top income earners — above $500,000 for individuals and above $600,000 for married couples filing jointly — falls from 39.6 percent to 37 percent.

The majority of individual income tax changes would be temporary, expiring after Dec.
31, 2025.

Pre-TCJA Tax Brackets Post-TCJA Tax Brackets (Effective Jan. 1, 2018)
Single Individuals
Taxable Income Tax Bracket Taxable Income Tax Bracket
$9,325 or less 10% $9,525 or less 10%
$9,326 to $37,950 15% $9,526 to $38,700 12%
$37,951 to $91,900 25% $38,701 to $82,500 22%
$91,901 to $191,650 28% $82,501 to $157,500 24%
$191,651 to $416,700 33% $157,501 to $200,000 32%
$416,701 to $418,400 35% $200,001 to $500,000 35%
Over $418,400 39.60% Over $500,000 37%

Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns and Surviving Spouses
Taxable Income Tax Bracket Taxable Income Tax Bracket
$18,650 or less 10% $19,050 or less 10%
$18,651 to $75,900 15% $19,051 to $77,400 12%
$75,901 to $153,100 25% $77,401 to $165,000 22%
$153,101 to $233,350 28% $165,001 to $315,000 24%
$233,351 to $416,700 33% $315,001 to $400,000 32%
$416,701 to $470,700 35% $400,001 to $600,000 35%
Over $470,700 39.60% Over $600,000 37%

Heads of Households
Taxable Income Tax Bracket Taxable Income Tax Bracket
$13,350 or less 10% $13,600 or less 10%
$13,351 to $50,800 15% $13,601 to $51,800 12%
$50,801 to $131,200 25% $51,801 to $82,500 22%
$131,201 to $212,500 28% $82,501 to $157,500 24%
$212,501 to $416,700 33% $157,501 to $200,000 32%
$416,701 to $444,550 35% $200,001 to $500,000 35%
Over $444,550 39.60% Over $500,000 37%

Married Individuals Filing Separate Returns
Taxable Income Tax Bracket Taxable Income Tax Bracket
$9,325 or less 10% Not over $9,525 10%
$9,326 to $37,950 15% $9,525 to $38,700 12%
$37,951 to $76,550 25% $38,701 to $82,500 22%
$76,551 to $116,675 28% $82,501 to $157,500 24%
$116,676 to $208,350 33% $157,501 to $200,000 32%
$208,351 to $235,350 35% $200,001 to $300,000 35%
Over $235,350 39.60% Over $300,000 37%

Tax deductions that didn’t change after the Trump tax plan

Teacher deduction

Teachers can deduct up to $250 for unreimbursed expenses for classroom supplies or school materials from their taxable income.

Electric cars

Electric car owners who bought a vehicle after 2010 may be given tax credit of up to $7,500, depending on the battery capacity.

Adoption assistance

Adoptive parents are allowed a tax credit and employer-provided benefits up to $13,570 per eligible child in 2017.

Student loan interest deduction

Student loan borrowers may deduct up to $2,500 on the interest paid for student loans every year.

How the Trump tax plan affects you

Low-income earners: Changes to the tax rates at lower-income levels were less pronounced or nonexistent compared to the changes in higher brackets, offering no tax break for lower-income households.

Middle-class earners: The decreased tax rates should have decreased the taxable income for middle-class earners, as long as they adjusted their W-4 withholding forms.

High-income earners: With their high levels of income falling into more brackets, high-income taxpayers had more to gain from the lowered tax rates. Those with large amounts of income from investments also benefited from the decreased tax brackets for capital gains, meaning their investment income was also reprieved, especially at high levels.

High-value estates: The Trump tax plan doubled the estate tax exemption amount from $5.49 million in 2017 to $11.2 million in 2018.

Areas with high state and local income tax: The Trump tax plan amended the state and local income tax (SALT) deduction so that taxpayers can only claim up to $10,000 in combined state and local income, sales and property taxes as an itemized deduction. Taxpayers living in places with high state and local taxes will get disproportionately hit by this change.

Taxpayers using personal exemptions: A personal exemption allowed you to deduct set amounts for each taxpayer and dependent on your tax return, which could have benefitted taxpayers with large families of dependents. This exemption and possible tax benefit for many has now been suspended.

Those without health insurance: The Trump tax plan eliminated the tax penalty you could face if you did not enroll for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and did not qualify for an exemption.

FAQ: Tax filing tips for 2020

Taxes for tax year 2019 are due to the IRS by July 15, 2020, due to the extension granted because of the coronavirus pandemic. Hopefully, filers won’t face an unwelcome surprise this year if they end up owing more than usual, as was the case too often last year, and instead receive a nice tax refund.

You might have been overpaying or underpaying on your taxes before the tax reform went into effect, which could mean a tax bill or bigger-than-expected tax refund this time around.

To avoid confusion, consult a tax professional and consider adjusting your allowances on your W-4.

If you end up owing taxes, you’ll need to pay your bill by July 15th or contact the IRS to sign up for a payment plan. Late payments will result in penalties and additional fees.

The IRS typically sends out tax refunds within 21 days of receiving your filing. It can take longer on some occasions, depending on your situation. If you file your return electronically, you can check the status of your refund after 24 hours from filing, through the IRS’ Where’s My Refund? tool. If you mail in your return, you can check the status four weeks after mailing. You can also use your smartphone to download the IRS2Go app to check your refund status.

It’s certainly tempting to use the money to book your next much-deserved vacation. But treating yourself isn’t necessarily the best way to spend your tax refund. Instead, consider stashing it away inside a savings vehicle and forgetting you even had extra cash to spend. An easy option is to boost your emergency savings by depositing your refund in a high-yield online savings account. That will grow your refund efficiently over time and can save you some financial grief in the future. Here are a couple of the best high-yield online savings accounts that have had consistently competitive rates over the past two years and are accessible no matter your deposit or balance:

Institution
APY
Minimum Account Balance to Earn APY
Capital One
360 Performance Savings from Capital One

1.30%

$0

SEE DETAILS 

Member FDIC

Barclays
Online Savings Account from Barclays

1.30%

$0

SEE DETAILS Secured

on Barclays’s secure website

Member FDIC

A savings account can be easily accessed in case you need the funds in a pinch, unlike with a high-rate certificate of deposit. A CD works better if you need to save towards a longer-term goal, like making a down payment on a house in a few years. Once you make your deposit into a CD, it grows undisturbed for the length of its term. In exchange for leaving your deposit untouched with the bank, you get to grow your CD funds at high interest rates, resulting in some solid savings growth when the term ends. Here are some of the best one-year CD rates that have been consistently competitive over the past two years:

Institution
APY
Minimum Account Balance to Earn APY
Barclays
12 Month Online CD from Barclays

1.20%

$0

SEE DETAILS 

Member FDIC

Goldman Sachs Bank USA
High-yield 12 Month CD from Goldman Sachs Bank USA

1.35%

$500

SEE DETAILS Secured

on Goldman Sachs Bank USA’s secure website

Member FDIC

Other options include using your refund to expand your investment portfolio or placing the funds in an IRA. Investing your refund can be a riskier way to grow your money since your returns depend on the market instead of an APY. And of course, saving in an IRA is a smart way to invest in your retirement future. The IRS even allows you to split your refund between multiple accounts when you sign up for direct deposit. This makes it easy for you to save your refund in various ways.

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.

Advertiser Disclosure

News

Coronavirus Pandemic Triggers Investing Regrets Among U.S. Investors

Editorial Note: The content of this article is based on the author’s opinions and recommendations alone and is not intended to be a source of investment advice. It has not been previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any of our network partners.

Written By

Reviewed By

As the coronavirus pandemic took a hold of the global economy in early 2020, investors everywhere panicked and sent the stock market plummeting to some of its worst days in recent history. Now that some of the immediate panic has subsided, many American investors are reflecting on recent investment moves that they now regret.

In a new MagnifyMoney survey, we found that many Americans regret their previous investing decisions in light of the COVID-19 crisis. However, many investors are also hopeful for the market’s future, which could make this a perfect time to plan your own future investing moves.

Key findings

  • More than half of investors regret past investing decisions brought to light by the COVID-19 crisis.
    • Younger generations, who are arguably less experienced investors, have more regrets than older investors. A whopping 92% of Gen Z investors admitted to an investing regret in some form or another.
    • Still, 79% of Gen X had regrets, compared to much lower numbers from baby boomers (33%) and the silent generation (24%).
  • About one-third of investors have full confidence that their investments will rebound by the end of 2020, but some have more hope than others.
    • Republicans are about twice as likely as Democrats and Independents to be very confident that their investments will recover by the end of the year.
    • Meanwhile, baby boomers and the silent generation are much less confident in their investments’ recovery than younger investors.
  • Consumers with investment accounts estimate their stock market losses are about $24,400 on average since the coronavirus outbreak slammed the United States in March.
    • Baby boomers and the silent generation lost the most, at roughly $56,000 and $63,300, respectively. Unfortunately, these are the generations likely relying heavily on their investments in retirement.
    • Women estimated they lost about $32,300 through the stock market, while men estimated their investment losses to be around $18,700.
  • More than one-third of Americans think it will be at least a year before the stock market recovers from the pandemic. 
    • However, it’s worth noting that more than 1 in 5 (22%) respondents believe the market will recover in just two to five months.
  • As the stock market shows signs of growth despite the bleak financial picture of many Americans, more than half of respondents agreed that the stock market does not completely depict the financial picture of the average U.S. consumer. 
    • Republicans and those who have investment accounts (including a retirement savings account) are more likely to believe the market mirrors the average consumer (around 35% in each group), compared to Democrats (24%) and those without investment accounts (13%).

The most common investing regrets amid coronavirus pandemic

Among our respondents, the top investing regret was a lack of portfolio diversification, a regret cited by 23% of respondents. Gen X respondents regretted this mistake the most at about 29%, with millennials not far behind at 27%. At 30%, men also cited this regret more than the 13% of women who admitted to making this error.

The second most common investment regret cited (19%) was taking on risky investments. Nearly one-third of Gen Z investors got burned by a risky investment. And while baby boomers and the silent generation were less likely to make this mistake, a quarter of Gen X confessed regretting this potentially costly move.

Some examples of high-risk investments can include initial public offerings (IPOs), structured products and venture capital trusts. You also may take on considerable risk if you’re trying to time the market for maximum returns, which many experts caution against.

The third common investment regret among respondents (13%) was keeping all of their savings in the stock market. Gen Z investors were the most guilty of this mistake, with 27% regretting keeping all of their savings in investments, followed by 15% of millennials, 13% of Gen X, 7% of baby boomers and a mere 2% of the silent generation.

How to avoid investing regrets

Luckily, these investing regrets are easily avoidable. Even if you found yourself regretting your pandemic-induced investment moves, there’s still time to recover.

Diversify your portfolio

For starters, it’s important to keep your assets diversified, or spread among different investments and across industries, whether you’re a beginner or an investing veteran. That way, when one part of the market takes a tumble, the other parts of your portfolio aren’t hit as badly, or at all. Essentially, by avoiding putting all of your eggs in one basket, your investments can be better protected in a downturn.

Cushion your risky investments

Keeping your portfolio well-balanced and diversified can also help mitigate risky investments that you might have taken on. It also helps to invest your money incrementally rather than in lump sums. That way, you’ll invest in both down and up times, balancing out your investment gains rather than going all in now and regretting your risk-taking later.

Acting reactively to the market is also a risk of its own. If you sell your assets just because everyone else is panicking, prices are driven down and you end up losing money because you’re making less on the sale than what you paid when you bought the asset. Instead, ride it out and keep your money invested. The markets will recover, and your assets’ valuation will go back up, too.

Invest toward long-term gains

Due to its nature, investing is a risky business. There’s the chance of losses and there is no guaranteed payout amount waiting for you. Because of these factors, it’s generally a bad idea to place all your savings bets on your investments. If you need cash in a downturn, you’ll be selling at a loss to withdraw from your investment accounts. Even further, selling off assets and turning them into cash takes time, making this a much less convenient method of withdrawing money than, say, heading to the ATM.

Instead, you should keep your investments geared toward the future, establishing more long-term goals for your investment accounts. This is why retirement accounts are often investment-based — it gives your investments time to accumulate, but also to ride out the many fluctuations of the market.

For your more immediate cash needs, keep money in a high-yield savings account. This allows for easier withdrawals and transfers, and ensures your money still grows. You can also open an interest-bearing checking account to make sure your money is growing no matter what account it’s in.

Methodology

MagnifyMoney commissioned Qualtrics to conduct an online survey of 2,008 Americans, with the sample base proportioned to represent the overall population. The sample population included 1,183 investors and 866 non-investors. We defined the generations in 2020 as follows:

  • Gen Z is defined as ages 18 to 22
  • Millennials as ages 23 to 38
  • Gen X as ages 39 to 53
  • Baby boomers as ages 54 to 73
  • Silent generation as ages 74 and over

The survey was fielded from April 28 to May 1, 2020.

Advertiser Disclosure: The products that appear on this site may be from companies from which MagnifyMoney receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). MagnifyMoney does not include all financial institutions or all products offered available in the marketplace.